Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/23/1897
State v. Blake
Citations
- 69 Conn. 64
- 36 A. 1019
- 1897 Conn. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- only legislature was authorized to accept bequest of Philip Marett on behalf of state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 166×
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1942-05-22· cited 80×
- Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court· 1948-03-31· cited 53×
- Allen v. NissleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-07· cited 52×
- Blumenthal v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-20· cited 34×
- Berndston v. AnninoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-03-13· cited 29×
- Richardson v. MulleryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1908-11-24· cited 24×
- State v. KiserConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-10-01· cited 22×
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-18· cited 18×
- State v. BillieConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-17· cited 15×
- State v. WargoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-15· cited 13×
- State v. CosbyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-12-31· cited 12×
- State v. CarmonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-03-03· cited 12×
- Burnham v. HayfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-03-16· cited 10×
- Marquardt & Roche/Meditz & Hackett, Inc. v. Riverbend Executive Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-01-07· cited 9×
- Goodno v. HotchkissD. Connecticut· 1916-10-23· cited 9×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-12-16· cited 5×
- Silverfarb v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1944-12-01· cited 2×
- Scott v. Indiana Board of AgricultureIndiana Supreme Court· 1922-06-30· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court· 1885-03-16· cited 342×
- Gallup v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-09-12· cited 50×
- Woodruff v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-05-05· cited 26×
- Clement v. BrainardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1878-05-15· cited 14×
- Seeley v. HincksSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1894-09-01· cited 13×
- Gates v. TreatSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1845-07-15· cited 10×
- Judson v. LakeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1809-06-15· cited 9×
- Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1855-10-15· cited 3×
- Marston v. MarstonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1860-07-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.