State v. Blair
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3370
Syllabus
A jury found appellant guilty of assaulting a fellow jail inmate. The trial court did not err by declining to give a self-defense instruction, as there was little evidence that appellant had feared imminent physical harm from the victim. The trial court also did not err by requiring appellant to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) in the courtroom. Wearing PPE at the height of the COVID pandemic was not inherently prejudicial, and in light of the video evidence of the assault in this case, which occurred when appellant was incarcerated in the county jail, appellant fails to show that he suffered actual prejudice. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
- State v. WolonsOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-05· cited 511×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 266×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-01· cited 28×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.