Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/21/2011
State v. BLACKWELL-SELIM
Citations
- 707 S.E.2d 426
- 392 S.C. 1
- 2011 S.C. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding because the trial court failed to make specific findings of fact to support its ruling, “there was nothing for the Court of Appeals to review”
- stating a history of criminal domestic violence under section 16-25-90 must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named State v. BLACKWELL-SELIM
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.