State v. Blackman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a court should apply the Blockburger test only when there is no clear legislative intent as to whether successive punishment should be imposed”
• “Because this statute expressly states punishment for armed criminal action is ‘in addition to’ other punishment defendant may receive for the felony committed, it clearly establishes the legislature’s intent to provide for successive punishment for those crimes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Missouri v. Richard Reynolds
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-09-20· cited 4×
• State of Missouri v. Gary Andrews, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-02-23
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. BRANT M. WINKLE
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2024-08-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Missouri v. Hunter
  Supreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
• United States v. Dixon
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
• State v. Blackman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-02-08· cited 41×
• State Ex Rel. Bulloch v. Seier
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1989-06-13· cited 25×
• State v. Morris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-03-12· cited 2×