Skip to main content
· 10/4/2023

State v. Black Cloud

Citations

  • 2023 S.D. 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “every federal appellate court has a special obligation to satisfy itself ... of its own jurisdiction”
  • holding that because sole appellant had no standing \Court of Appeals was without [both] jurisdiction to hear the appeal\ and \authority to decide the merits\
  • holding that because sole appellant had no standing “Court of Appeals was without [both] jurisdiction to hear the appeal” and “authority to decide the merits”
  • holding that a member of the school board who “has no personal stake in the outcome of the litigation” had no standing
  • holding that a school board member who “has no personal stake in the outcome of the litigation” lacked standing
  • holding that there was nothing in the record “to support the suggestion that relief was sought against [the officials] in [their] individual capacity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mark E. Salter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.