· 10/4/2023
State v. Black Cloud
Citations
- 2023 S.D. 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “every federal appellate court has a special obligation to satisfy itself ... of its own jurisdiction”
- holding that because sole appellant had no standing \Court of Appeals was without [both] jurisdiction to hear the appeal\ and \authority to decide the merits\
- holding that because sole appellant had no standing “Court of Appeals was without [both] jurisdiction to hear the appeal” and “authority to decide the merits”
- holding that a member of the school board who “has no personal stake in the outcome of the litigation” had no standing
- holding that a school board member who “has no personal stake in the outcome of the litigation” lacked standing
- holding that there was nothing in the record “to support the suggestion that relief was sought against [the officials] in [their] individual capacity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mark E. Salter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.