State v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that oral sex in the city jail's \drunk tank\ occurred in a public place where jail staff, other inmates, and people on public tours could view the act
• concluding that oral sex in the city jail’s “drunk tank” occurred in a public place where jail staff, other inmates, and people on public tours could view the act
• holding that “drunk tank” was public place for purposes of public sexual indecency statute because of the possibility of being observed by persons on an occasional tour of the jail, frequent visitors to inmates, and the other inmates present
• interpreting Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1811 (1976) to find jail’s “drunk tank” is a public place
• \drunk tank\ of city jail, wherein jailer observed defendant allegedly engaging in oral sex with another prisoner, was a \public place\ within the meaning of the public sexual indecency statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Romero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-10-17· cited 19×
• Leo Ricardo Barnes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-03-05· cited 11×
• Heslip v. Lobbs
  E.D. Arkansas· 1982-12-07· cited 3×
• in the Interest of D.C. —
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-02-21· cited 2×
• Carlos Owens v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-09-25
• In re D.C.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-02-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Messina v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-04-05· cited 42×
• Bishoff v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-01-14· cited 12×