State v. Bivins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[H]earsay is permissible in suppression hearings . . . [which] may include evidence inadmissible in the trial on the merits.”
• “[H]earsay is permissible in suppression hearings . . . [which] may include evidence inadmissible in the trial on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Atwood
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-03-29· cited 41×
• Samuel Mejia v. Quest Diagnostics (082739) (Essex County & Statewide)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2020-03-16
• Houston v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2021-04-20

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Summers
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
• Steele v. United States No. 1
  Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
• Bailey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 390×
• State v. Antoine D. Watts(074556)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-12-02· cited 164×
• Schneider v. Simonini
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-03-06· cited 148×
• State v. Valencia
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-05-16· cited 139×
• State v. Frankel
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-05-12· cited 129×
• State v. Edmonds
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-07-26· cited 123×
• State v. De Simone
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-03-27· cited 109×
• State v. Marshall
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2009-07-21· cited 68×
• Hilvety v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-04· cited 46×
• State v. Bruno Gibson (072257)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2014-09-16· cited 27×
• State v. Brown
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-01-27· cited 20×
• State v. Gibson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-02-07· cited 15×
• State of New Jersey v. Chad Bivins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-05-13· cited 4×