State v. Bissell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court’s refusal to give a requested cautionary instruction when rule 609(a
• holding that the district court can mitigate the potential prejudice arising from its failure to give the limiting instruction promptly by giving the instruction during its final instructions
• finding no prejudice where “no one suggested that the evidence should be used for any purpose other than determining defendant’s credibility as a witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Profit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
• State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 70×
• State v. Frisinger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-01· cited 46×
• State v. Word
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-09-16· cited 35×
• State v. Meldrum
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-11-28· cited 13×
• State v. Craig
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-12-05· cited 11×
• State v. Irby
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-09-04· cited 10×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Brouillette
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-26· cited 133×
• State v. Forsman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-09-02· cited 72×
• State v. Carlson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-12· cited 43×