State v. Bissantz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• bribery-in-office conviction bore a direct and substantial relationship to the privilege of holding public office
• “[T]he Court of Appeals for Clermont County concluded that the trial court's order granting expungement was neither against the weight of the evidence nor an abuse of discretion. We will not disturb that finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Gains v. Rossi
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 86×
• State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 22×
• State v. Greene
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 14×
• Morrison v. Board of Trustees of Green Tp.
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-11-29· cited 13×
• State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 10×
• State v. M.D.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-05· cited 8×
• Gyugo v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Dev. Disabilities (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-27· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Reynolds v. Nix
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-09-25· cited 4×
• State v. McVean
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-10· cited 3×
• Bound v. Biscotti
  Lakewood Municipal Court· 1995-12-29· cited 3×
• State v. Dzama
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-01· cited 1×
• State v. Jones
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-09