State v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “At no time during the initial charge on murder was the jury told to consider passion/ provocation which could reduce the murder to manslaughter unless the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant did not kill in the heat of passion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vasquez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-05-27· cited 31×
• State v. Hatcher
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-10-24· cited 17×
• State v. Bolaski
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-04-25· cited 14×
• State v. Tucker
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-06-11· cited 9×
• State v. Reese
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-08-19· cited 6×
• State v. Robinson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-06-08· cited 3×
• State of Tennessee v. William Langston
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2017-05-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
• State v. Marshall
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-01-24· cited 445×
• Kentucky v. Whorton
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 342×
• State v. Zola
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-10-07· cited 244×
• State v. Crisantos (Arriagas)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-05-06· cited 205×
• State v. Grunow
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-03-12· cited 168×
• State v. Coyle
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-06-11· cited 149×
• State v. Ingram
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-03-13· cited 86×
• State v. Vick
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-11-30· cited 68×
• State v. Bishop
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-06-15· cited 12×