State v. Bingman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an assault charge and a witness tampering charge “were properly joined” where the “assault charge provide[d] a motive for and precipitate[d] the tampering charge”
• affirming joinder of assault and tampering with evidence charges because the assault charge clearly precipitated the tampering charge
• affirming consolidation of assault and witness tampering charges because the assault charge “clearly * * * provide[d] a motive for and precipitate[d] the tampering charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).