Skip to main content

State v. Bingham

Citations

  • 921 S.W.2d 494
  • 1996 WL 194260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring proof of phlebotomist’s qualifications to determine admissibility of blood taken from person arrested for driving while intoxicated
  • requiring proof of phlebotomist’s qualifications to determine admissibility of blood taken from person arrested for driving while intoxicated
  • requiring proof of phlebotomist's qualifications to determine admissibility of blood taken from person arrested for driving while intoxicated
  • requiring proof of phlebotomist's qualifications to determine admissibility of blood taken from person arrested for driving while intoxicated
  • “The common-sense interpretation of the term ‘qualified technician[]’ . . . must include a phlebotomist who a hospital or other medical facility has determined to be qualified in the technical job of venesection or phlebotomy, i.e., the drawing of blood.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.