State v. Binford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing the State to call witnesses to rebut the defendant’s testimony, “which was the product of his last minute decision to [testify]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Greer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-11-25· cited 6×
• State v. Passarelli
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-16· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kelly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-23· cited 87×
• Gupta v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 49×
• State v. Mitchell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 28×
• State v. Marahrens
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-01· cited 28×
• State v. Birdsall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-15· cited 26×
• State v. Anders
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-04-08· cited 19×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-07-18· cited 18×
• State v. Madison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 17×
• State v. Lindsay
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-13· cited 11×
• State v. Lockett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-12-08· cited 10×
• State v. Claytor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-04-21· cited 7×
• State v. Deddens, in and for County of Cochise
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-05-31· cited 4×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-07-05· cited 3×