State v. Bildstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Secretary's gap-filling regulation in question was \inconsistent with the statute and cannot stand\
• holding Secretary’s gap-filling regulation in question was “inconsistent with the statute and cannot stand”
• invalidating VA regulation to the extent that Secretary’s interpretation of it is followed
• invalidating VA regulation to the extent that Secretary's interpretation of it is followed
• invalidating a regulation denying retroactive vocational rehabilitation program benefits to veterans who received benefits under another VA education or training program during any period for which retroactive benefits were sought; 38 C.F.R. § 21.282(b)(2)(ii) (1994)
• invalidating a regulation denying retroactive vocational rehabilitation program benefits to veterans who received benefits under another VA education or training program during any period for which retroactive benefits were sought; 38 C.F.R. § 21.282(b)(2)(ii) (1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).