State v. Big Sky Drilling, Inc.

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 7511

Syllabus

Summary judgment Civ.R. 56 statute of limitations. The court determined that Big Sky's claims were filed outside the statute of limitations. Further, there was no genuine issue of material fact that the Attorney General's Office instituted the enforcement action against Big Sky solely in a representative capacity and was not amenable to suit. Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted.