State v. Biehler

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 383

Syllabus

Judge Zmuda, writing for the majority, affirms the judgment, finding the trial court did not impose nonmandatory costs, either at the sentencing hearing or in the judgment entry, with \costs of this action\ referring only to the mandatory costs permitted under R.C. 2929.18(A)(4); despite the state conceding error, in the absence of the trial court specifying additional, nonmandatory costs in the entry or at hearing, \costs of this action\ imposes only mandatory costs.