Skip to main content
· 2/6/1909

State v. Bevill

Citations

  • 79 Kan. 524
  • 100 P. 476
  • 1909 Kan. LEXIS 228

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Perjury—Evidence. In a prosecution for perjury the judgment of acquittal in the cause in which the perjury was committed is not admissible to prove the defendant’s innocence. (The State v. Williams, 60 Kan. 837, syllabus, 58 Pac. 476.)</p> <p>2. -Plea in Bar. A party can not, after securing an acquittal by perjury, successfully plead such acquittal in bar of a prosecution for the perjury so committed.</p>

Judges: Benson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.