State v. Bevard
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 982
Syllabus
The trial court's statement during a plea hearing about appellant's two offenses not merging as allied offenses did not invalidate his guilty plea. The trial court's tentative assessment of the issue repeated what defense counsel already had told appellant and was supported by case law. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that university violated Title IX when it discontinued women's varsity fast pitch softball team
- holding that university violated Title IX when it discontinued women’s varsity fast pitch softball team
- stating that “it would require blinders to ignore that the motivation for” enacting Title IX and its sports regulations was to promote opportunities for girls in sports
- stating that “it would require blinders to ignore that the motivation for” enacting Title IX and its sports regulations was to promote opportunities for girls in sports
- stating that “the ordinary meaning of the word ‘expansion’ may not be twisted to find compliance under [prong two] when schools have increased the relative percentages of women participating in athletics by making cuts in both men’s and women’s sports programs”
- reversing summary judgment for plaintiff on Title IX claim and refusing to address equal protection claim in exclusion of boy from girls' field hockey
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.