· 3/11/2013
State v. Bettys
Citations
- 174 Wash. App. 1002
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding order directing -5- J-S24018-23 QDRO did not affect either party’s substantive rights but was simply procedural mechanism to effectuate pension entitlement as agreed to by parties
- discussing QDROs, which trial courts had approved subsequent to divorce decree in each case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Grosse, Lau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.