Skip to main content
· 3/11/2013

State v. Bettys

Citations

  • 174 Wash. App. 1002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding order directing -5- J-S24018-23 QDRO did not affect either party’s substantive rights but was simply procedural mechanism to effectuate pension entitlement as agreed to by parties
  • discussing QDROs, which trial courts had approved subsequent to divorce decree in each case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Grosse, Lau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.