Skip to main content
· 2/8/1985

State v. Berrisford

Citations

  • 361 N.W.2d 846
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a statement made 90 minutes after a murder may be considered an excited utterance
  • deferring to the district court’s determination that the declarant was under a sufficient aura of excitement
  • affirming the admission of a statement made “just 90 minutes after the murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.