State v. Bernier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that admissions include any statement made and offered against a party-opponent, and the statements need not be against the declarant's interest when made
• explaining that admissions include any statement made and offered against a party-opponent, and the statements need not be against the declarant’s interest when made
• rejecting defendant’s argument that “only incriminating statements constitute admissions” and holding that “[a]dmissions include any statement made by and offered against a party opponent”
• declining to address issue argued in brief but waived at oral argument
• questions on tape recording not hearsay because not offered for proof of the matters asserted in them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-09-07· cited 24×
• Sundstrom v. Sundstrom
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-10-21· cited 23×
• Greene v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-20· cited 22×
• State v. West
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-01· cited 19×
• State v. Lawrence, Sr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-09· cited 11×
• State v. Coburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-04-14· cited 11×
• People v. Meier
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-03-09· cited 10×
• State v. BELONGA
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-03-16· cited 10×
• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-02-23· cited 9×
• State v. Perez
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-06-16· cited 7×
• State v. YAI BOL
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-09· cited 6×
• State v. Theodore Dmitri Colehamer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2023-07-14· cited 1×