State v. Bernard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the 7 case to address an alternative issue because it could change the disposition of the case
• holding the court was bound by its precedent
• “Among its conclusions of law, the trial court concluded that: (1) Watson stopped appellee without reasonable suspicion of driving while intoxicated; and (2
• “In its first point of error, the State presented two arguments in support of the traffic stop: (1) there was reasonable suspicion that appellee violated Transportation Code Section 545.060(a); and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bernard
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-01-23· cited 4×
• State v. Sheila Jo Hardin
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2019-08-01
• Kevin Dugar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2021-04-07
• Bernard Daniel v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2021-12-23
• Ajak Malual Gwath v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-08-18
• DANIEL, BERNARD v. the State of Texas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2024-02-14
• YOUNG, MARTIN v. the State of Texas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2026-05-14

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Albert Tyrone Bernard
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-08· cited 9×