State v. Bernal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in controlled substances homicide case, “the corpus delicti rule requires that the State produce evidence, independent of the accused’s statements, sufficient to support a finding that the charged crime was committed by someone”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hummel
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-01-03· cited 24×
• State v. McPhee
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-11· cited 23×
• State v. Valdez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-13· cited 7×
• State v. Bernal
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-07

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Vangerpen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-02-09· cited 277×
• State v. Aten
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 189×
• State v. Boyer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-01-04· cited 155×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 122×
• City of Bremerton v. Corbett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-21· cited 110×
• State v. Meyer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1951-01-04· cited 108×
• State v. Lung
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-01-26· cited 64×
• State v. Neslund
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-02-08· cited 57×
• State v. Ray
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 55×
• State v. Nass
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-07-10· cited 36×
• State v. Pineda
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-28· cited 25×
• State v. Langworthy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-10· cited 23×
• State v. Solomon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-11· cited 18×
• State v. Flowers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-28· cited 5×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-03-23· cited 2×