State v. Bennett
Citations
- 234 N.E.3d 629
- 2024 Ohio 274
Syllabus
The trial court erred in concluding that appellant's jury demand was untimely, when it was filed on or before the third day following appellant's receipt of notice of the continued trial date, and in denying him a jury trial based on the untimeliness of the request. The Ohio Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over a party's request that a judge be removed from a case for bias, prejudice, or any other reason. As such, this court is without jurisdiction to rule upon appellant's assertion that the trial judge should have recused herself from the case. Judgment reversed and remanded.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Mentor v. GiordanoOhio Supreme Court· 1967-03-15· cited 134×
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-11· cited 108×
- City of Tallmadge v. DeGraft-BineyOhio Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 19×
- State v. HusseinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27· cited 10×
- State v. StaufferOhio Supreme Court· 1976-11-10· cited 8×
- Columbus Checkcashers, Inc. v. Guttermaster, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-17· cited 7×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.