State v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that speculation as to the evidence which the examiner seeks to elicit does not provide the substance of the evidence necessary to dispense with an offer of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Urbano
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-02-12· cited 240×
• Walkenhorst v. State, Department of Roads
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-13· cited 60×
• State v. Greer
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-10-13· cited 31×
• State v. Lewchuk
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-11-21· cited 22×
• State v. Bennett
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-04-16· cited 17×
• State v. Eldred
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 5×
• State v. Harris
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-08-18· cited 4×
• State v. Torres Aquino
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2025-04-18· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Randolph
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1971-01-22· cited 130×
• State v. Stratton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 69×
• State v. Kramer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-31· cited 62×
• State v. Philipps
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 50×
• State v. Riley
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 43×
• State v. Cortis
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-01-25· cited 39×
• State v. Leadinghorse
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1974-10-24· cited 37×
• State v. Reynolds
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 30×
• Hite v. Moynahan
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 21×
• State v. Ellen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-05-28· cited 15×
• State v. Wounded Arrow
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-02-21· cited 10×