State v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when treatment in a sex offender program fails, a good faith attempt to comply with the conditions of probation must be distinguished from a violation of conditions which relate to the defendant’s potential for rehabilitation
• “Requiring a defendant to undergo psychiatric treatment is a common condition of probation and is generally considered to be reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-29· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-09-19· cited 11×
• State v. Melos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-01-21· cited 9×
• State v. Kochvi
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-02-12· cited 8×
• State v. Gann
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-23· cited 4×
• State v. Ralph
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-16· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kuhn
  Washington Supreme Court· 1972-12-07· cited 62×
• State v. Oyler
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-01-30· cited 60×
• Humphrey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-22· cited 31×
• United States v. Manfredonia
  S.D. New York· 1972-03-31· cited 20×
• State v. Osborn
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 11×
• State v. Giraud
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-03-03· cited 10×
• State v. LaRoque
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-01-24· cited 10×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-06-23· cited 4×
• State v. Lumley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-04-20· cited 1×