State v. Bembenek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Newly discovered evidence’ does not include a new appreciation of the importance of evidence previously known but not used.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Orndorff v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-06-14· cited 6×
• State v. Wilber
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-12-26· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
• State v. Woods
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 131×
• State v. Dean
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-07-06· cited 89×
• State v. Sharlow
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 30×
• State v. Bembenek
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-02-14· cited 28×
• State v. Boyce
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-02-01· cited 24×
• State v. Ramey
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-10-03· cited 11×