State v. Bellino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IAD does not apply to parolees because they are not \prisoners serving a sentence in prison\
• holding that the IAD does not apply to parolees because they are not \prisoners serving a sentence in prison\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holley
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-03· cited 6×
• Womble v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-03-19· cited 5×
• State v. Burnett
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-05-24· cited 3×
• STATE EX REL. FREDERICK LEE PHARM v. Bartow
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2007-01-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Michael Roberts, United States of America v. Charles Williams, United States of America v. Stanley Yelardy
  Sixth Circuit· 1977-02-02· cited 123×
• Robert Lee Ridgeway v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 51×
• Santana v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 48×
• Eisenberg v. Board of Wisconsin State Bar Commissioners
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 37×
• State v. Laverty
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-07-17· cited 7×