State v. Bellina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a \distinct act in recognition\ of a claimant's right is required in order to prevent the rule of repose from extinguishing a cause of action
• stating that the presumption period expired 20 years after the claimants “might have demanded an accounting”
• “[N]o act is alleged in recognition of said agency or trusteeship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).