Skip to main content

State v. Bell

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3813

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's application for post-conviction DNA testing, when his previous application for DNA testing had been denied because the trial court found the results of the testing would not be outcome determinative. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.