Skip to main content

State v. Belgarde

Citations

  • 815 P.2d 812
  • 62 Wash. App. 684
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a defendant’s retrial, following reversal of an earlier conviction, constituted further proceedings in the same case as opposed to new proceedings or a new case
  • approving jury instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in his termination
  • approving jury instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in his termination
  • plaintiffs' employment discrimination action damages for front pay were duplicative as a matter of law to damages for lost business opportunity
  • plaintiffs’ employment discrimination action damages for front pay were duplicative as a matter of law to damages for lost business opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pekelis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.