State v. Beishline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that as a general rule, “[a] defendant cannot create exculpatory evidence by introducing self-serving, hearsay statements” made by the defendant to another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Missouri v. Marion Clyde Ellis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 30×
• State v. Marshall
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-07-25· cited 9×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MARION WILLIAM KASPARIE, JR.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-11-10· cited 3×
• State v. Wright
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-31· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Feltrop
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-02-07· cited 245×
• State v. Chambers
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-01-24· cited 134×
• Feltrop v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-28· cited 126×
• State v. Sweet
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-10-16· cited 53×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-02-13· cited 35×
• State v. MacK
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-25· cited 26×
• State v. Gray
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-04-07· cited 13×
• State v. Suarez
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-10-26· cited 13×
• State v. Kramer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-03-12· cited 7×
• State v. Elder
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-04-04· cited 6×