State v. Behl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute requiring flat-time sentence controls over § 13— 604, which renders defendant parole eligible after serving two-thirds of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tarango
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-04-16· cited 66×
• Welch-Doden v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-03-21· cited 55×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-07-29· cited 28×
• State v. Murray
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 27×
• State v. Tarango
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-05-23· cited 11×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-03-16· cited 7×
• State of Arizona v. Hon. Howard Fell Edward John Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-13· cited 163×
• State v. Sweet
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-16· cited 136×
• State v. Wagstaff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-07· cited 96×
• Pima County v. Heinfeld
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-12· cited 68×
• State v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-07· cited 19×
• Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-18· cited 15×
• Tempe Life Care Village, Inc. v. City of Tempe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-10· cited 9×
• State v. Cain
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-14· cited 7×
• State v. Griffin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-10-01· cited 3×