State v. Beekman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although the defendant's charges were distinct crimes, testimony from many of the same witnesses was used to prove both charges, and rejecting the defendant's argument that joinder required the charges to rely on identical evidence
• \A motion for severance is addressed to the trial court and should not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is shown.\ (quoting State v. Tucker, 324 S.C. 155, 164, 478 S.E.2d 260, 265 (1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-06-14· cited 7×
• State v. Perry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06
• State v. Tallent
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-06-10
• State v. Heyward
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-10-07
• State v. Gleaton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-08-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 105×
• State v. Middleton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-01-29· cited 63×
• State v. Cutro
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-08-15· cited 43×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
• State v. Beekman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 22×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 18×
• State v. Tate
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-08-19· cited 17×
• State v. McGaha
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 8×