· 8/29/1989
State v. Bedoni
Citations
- 779 P.2d 355
- 161 Ariz. 480
- 42 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the “intent to defraud” requirement of the Arizona forgery statute is satisfied by showing the defendant obtained a “benefit or advantage”
- suggesting risk of trouble for “some unknown person” sufficient evidence of intent to defraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Brooks, Claborne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.