Skip to main content
· 8/29/1989

State v. Bedoni

Citations

  • 779 P.2d 355
  • 161 Ariz. 480
  • 42 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the “intent to defraud” requirement of the Arizona forgery statute is satisfied by showing the defendant obtained a “benefit or advantage”
  • suggesting risk of trouble for “some unknown person” sufficient evidence of intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Brooks, Claborne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.