State v. Beckwith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “conduct and the Alford plea were appropriate circumstances for consideration because they reflected a lack of culpability and remorse[.]”
• explaining that “[w]e apply the abuse of discretion standard in reviewing a sentencing court’s decision to depart from presumptive probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Janis
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-05-18· cited 11×
• State v. Roedder
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-30· cited 10×
• State v. Underwood
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-01-25· cited 6×
• State v. Flowers
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-09-14· cited 3×
• State v. Kurtz
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-02-28· cited 3×
• State v. Feucht
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-04-03· cited 2×
• State of West Virginia v. Dennis Abe Arbough
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2016-09-06

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Knight
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2005-07-01· cited 98×
• State v. Nelson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-12-16· cited 97×
• Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-08-14· cited 35×
• State v. Engelmann
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-12-27· cited 25×
• State v. Thayer
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 17×
• State v. Whitfield
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-04-01· cited 15×
• State v. Stahl
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-12-13· cited 10×
• State v. Hernandez
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-03-19· cited 4×
• State v. Moran
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-03-18· cited 3×
• Duxbury v. McCook County
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1925-09-18· cited 2×