State v. Beck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to be guilty of driving while intoxicated, the driver must be in physical control and must have had the car in motion at the time in question
• to be guilty of driving while intoxicated, the driver must be in physical control and must have had the car in motion at the time in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Votava
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 38×
• State v. Dodson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-08· cited 1×
• State v. Beck
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-30
• State v. Hazzard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-04-01
• City of Spokane v. Emma Rose Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-12-05

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wanrow
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 96×
• State v. Collins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-01-14· cited 59×
• Myrick v. Board of Pierce County Commissioners
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-09-21· cited 54×
• McGuire v. City of Seattle
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-03-22· cited 17×
• State v. Pyles
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-03· cited 7×