Missouri Court of Appeals· 2/16/1988
State v. Bearden
Citations
- 748 S.W.2d 753
- 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 216
- 1988 WL 10699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutor’s argument improperly referred to informant telephone calls which were not admitted in evidence and to testimony that would have been given by other police officers not called to testify
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karohl, Kelly, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Corson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-12-27· cited 12×
- State v. BaldridgeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-04-13· cited 12×
- State v. McFerronMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 11×
- State v. WoodmanseeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-17· cited 9×
- State v. DelancyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-07-22· cited 7×
- State v. OplingerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-02-03· cited 5×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Newlon v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 261×
- State v. NewlonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-02-09· cited 237×
- State v. ChunnMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-07-19· cited 33×
- State v. EmbryMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-10-14· cited 20×
- State v. HobbyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-01-14· cited 13×
- State v. DarnellMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-08-04· cited 8×
- State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-06-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.