State v. Bealor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that police officers generally are qualified to offer expert testimony on marijuana intoxication based upon basic precommission training
• recognizing that police officers generally are qualified to offer expert testimony on marijuana intoxication based upon basic pre-commission training
• explaining that “[s]ince 1924, ... New Jersey has permitted the use of lay opinion testimony to establish alcohol intoxication”
• explaining that the “smell of burnt marijuana on defendant,” among other facts, was relevant to whether defendant was guilty of operating a motor vehicle “under the influence” of marijuana
• noting that expert testimony is preferred on a cause of intoxication other than alcohol
• noting that expert testimony is preferred on a cause of intoxication other than alcohol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).