State v. Bayaoa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the United States Supreme Court’s reasoning to the contrary, pursuant to the United States Constitution, in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979)
• agreeing with the dissenting Bell justices that, at least in the context of Fourth Amendment searches, \the rights of persons not yet convicted of crimes must be more closely scrutinized than the rights of prisoners.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).