State v. Bauerly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a one-year gross misdemeanor sentence, one day less than the presumptive year-and-a-day felony sentence, constituted a durational departure
• holding that age and lack of felony record are not valid grounds for durational departures
• holding that a year-long sentence for an offense that called for a presumptive sentence of a year and a day was a durational departure
• holding that a year-long sentence for an offense that carried a presumptive sentence of a year and a day is a downward durational departure
• holding that age and lack of felony record are not valid bases for durational departures
• ruling that imposition of a 365-day gross-misdemeanor sentence on a felony theft conviction with a presumptive guidelines sentence of 366 days constituted a downward durational departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).