Skip to main content
· 8/2/1985

State v. Battershaw

Citations

  • 371 N.W.2d 313
  • 220 Neb. 661
  • 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to review assigned error regarding psychiatric evaluations, since the defendant failed to object at sentencing hearing when the evaluations were offered
  • district court lacked jurisdiction to consider a motion for new trial filed after an appeal had been perfected
  • district court is divested of jurisdiction over particular case when appeal of case is perfected to appellate court
  • defendant’s failure to object to psychiatric evaluations offered at sentencing hearing precluded review of the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.