· 8/2/1985
State v. Battershaw
Citations
- 371 N.W.2d 313
- 220 Neb. 661
- 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to review assigned error regarding psychiatric evaluations, since the defendant failed to object at sentencing hearing when the evaluations were offered
- district court lacked jurisdiction to consider a motion for new trial filed after an appeal had been perfected
- district court is divested of jurisdiction over particular case when appeal of case is perfected to appellate court
- defendant’s failure to object to psychiatric evaluations offered at sentencing hearing precluded review of the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.