State v. Batiste

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because defendant’s alleged violations of probation could not be meaningfully distinguished from those at issue in Williams, the evidence failed to support the trial court’s conclusion that defendant willfully absconded from supervision
• concluding that because defendant’s alleged violations of probation could not be meaningfully distinguished from those at issue in Williams, the evidence failed to support the trial court’s conclusion that defendant willfully absconded from supervision
• concluding that because defendant’s alleged violations of probation could not be meaningfully distinguished from those at issue in Williams, the evidence failed to support the trial court’s conclusion that defendant willfully absconded from supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Crompton
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-02-11