Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 10/3/2006
State v. Bates
Citations
- 634 S.E.2d 919
- 179 N.C. App. 628
- 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 2013
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court “differentiated between some of the counts by including next to the charge the words ‘(by cunnilingus)’ or ‘(inserting finger into victim’s vagina)’”
- setting forth four factors to consider in determining whether the defendant was denied a unanimous verdict: (1) the evidence, (2) the indictments, (3) the jury charge, and (4) the verdict sheets
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.