Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/29/2019
State v. Bates
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1172
Syllabus
Trial court entry denying defendant's motion to correct his original judgement of conviction and sentence was a final appealable order. Sentencing entry that lacks the judge's signature does not comply with Crim.R. 32(C) and should be corrected by means of a nunc pro tunc entry.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
- City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 158×
- State v. CoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2001-03-07· cited 85×
- State ex rel. DeWine v. BurgeOhio Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 83×
- Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 46×
- State ex rel. Culgan v. Medina County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 44×
- State v. Roberts (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 31×
- Dunn v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-17· cited 29×
- State ex rel. Alicea v. KrichbaumOhio Supreme Court· 2010-07-14· cited 22×
- State ex rel. Snead v. FerencOhio Supreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Henley v. LangerOhio Supreme Court· 2018-12-26· cited 12×
- State v. I'JujuOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-19· cited 8×
- State v. PeoplesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-16· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Bates v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common PleaseOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.