State v. Bates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• amortization not specifically authorized by statute or state constitution
• applying the “general rule” that “constitutional provisions operate prospectively”
• applying the “general rule” that “constitutional provisions operate prospectively”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cousan
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-11-25· cited 125×
• Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-10-23· cited 91×
• Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2006-07-14· cited 81×
• Ex Parte Southern Ry. Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-11-21· cited 40×
• Millennium Solutions, Inc. v. Davis
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-12-10· cited 30×
• Paluck v. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS, STARK COUNTY
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 22×
• McDowell, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-08-25· cited 18×
• Renda v. Polk County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-05-19· cited 4×
• Paluck v. Board of County Commissioners
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 4×
• North Liberty Land Co. v. Incorporated City of North Liberty
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-10-21· cited 3×
• In re N.S.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2024-11-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kasparek v. Johnson County Board of Health
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-02-20· cited 23×
• McMurry v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Lee County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-01-18· cited 4×