State v. Bates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that rule 404(b) does not proscribe the introduction of evidence \elicited to describe the state of mind of the victim\
• explaining that evidence was admissible where it was \elicited to describe the state of mind of the victim\ to explain why the victim \was afraid of defendant\ and thus \did not report the incidents sooner\
• finding error in admitting expert’s bolstering testimony where “State did not qualify her as an expert on discerning truth”
• affirming admission of the victim's testimony about the defendant's prior bad act because the testimony was offered to show the victim's state of mind-namely, her fear of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Grady William Powers
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-07-14· cited 225×
• United States v. George Mandoka
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-08-24· cited 30×
• State v. Labrum
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-09· cited 25×
• State v. Peters
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-08-02· cited 21×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2007-06-01· cited 16×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1998-07-30· cited 13×
• State v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2012-10-12· cited 10×
• State v. Davenport
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-10-16· cited 2×
• Riche v. NORTH OGDEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rimmasch
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 202×
• State v. Fulton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-05-28· cited 73×
• State v. Hutchison
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-09-03· cited 38×