State v. Baskins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a \conclusion\ was not in actuality a conclusion of law where it consisted of a simple statement of law that detention of a motorist for probable cause does not violate the Fourth Amendment followed by a separate statement that the detention in the case was justified
• “[W]e recognize that the record may not contain all the relevant evidence available to Detective O’Hal on 6 October 2014, but our review is limited to the record evidence in this regard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Faulk
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07· cited 10×
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-02· cited 1×
• State v. Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-12-29
• State v. San
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-07-18