State v. Baskett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it may be good practice to ask for a bill of particulars if a defendant is unsure of the specific acts alleged”
• not citing Vandebogart and concluding that defense counsel was not entitled to impeach complainant’s testimony with extrinsic evidence demonstrating that her testimony on cross-examination was false
• it may be a “good practice to ask for a bill of particulars if a defendant is unsure of the specific acts alleged”
• “[A]n objection to jury instructions raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial is not timely.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).