State v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert satisfied confrontation right because the expert “formed his opinion based on his own expertise and his own analysis of the scientific testing. He then presented his conclusions to the jury, and he was available ... for cross-examination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blaylock v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-14· cited 34×
• Antron Rammel Blaylock v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• People v. Thomas
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-10· cited 81×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-30· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-04-09· cited 10×